Do you think the 2-implant overdenture is a good choice for many patients?
Dr. Scherer: It is interesting that you ask that. I’ve been treating patients with LOCATOR overdentures for 10-plus years, and with an incredible amount of success. Remember Eula, who was mentioned earlier? She has only 2 implants in the mandibular anterior and is doing really well. In fact, I was so inspired that I ended up publishing several papers studying the effectiveness of implant position, number, and retention mechanisms across multiple configurations. I showed that the LOCATOR 2-implant overdenture was more than adequate for proper denture retention and stability (Figure 1). Furthermore, the literature has shown that 4 implants and stud-style abutments, such as a LOCATOR, are just as good, if not potentially easier, for the patient to keep clean and better in the long term than a bar design (Figure 2).
What’s your take on narrow-diameter implants, and aren’t they also called mini implants?
Dr. Scherer: Yes, but I never call them “mini implants.” With that name, in my opinion, it sounds like it is a “lower quality implant” and it doesn’t come across with the proper message that I want to send to patients. I have even found that patients come to me asking, “Are they as good as ‘regular’ implants?” I respond to patients who ask these questions by indicating that the implant that I use for narrow bone cases is just as good as the one that I use in regular bone cases. That patient just has a narrow ridge, so I provide a narrow implant. They totally get it. It’s not what you say, but how you say it.
What implant systems do you use in your practice and how do you restore them for your overdenture cases?
Dr. Scherer: My go-to narrow-diameter implant system is the LOCATOR Overdenture Implant (LODI) System (Zest Dental Solutions) (Figure 3). They have designed a 2-piece standard implant with a narrow shape that allows it to fit within any bone ridge situation. I have been placing and restoring these implants for more than 4 years now and have had incredible results.
I have heard you describe yourself as a “computer nerd who just happened to become a dentist.” Can you please elaborate?
Dr. Scherer: Yes, it’s true! Growing up, I just naturally flocked to video games. So when computers were first coming on board in the 1980s, playing games on the desktop computer was a natural progression.
Wait. Are you saying that you are playing video games every day in your office between patients?
Dr. Scherer: I wish! My wife, Dr. Melissa Shotell, is an orthodontist who treats teenagers all day long, whereas I treat predominantly older, retired baby boomers. Sometimes, I would love to join her patients gaming in the waiting room. If I tried doing that with my patients, they would think I’m nuts. Yet, dentistry and video games are very similar; both require a tremendous amount of hand-eye coordination, critical thinking, troubleshooting skills, and patience.
Dentists are at the forefront of the technological revolution in healthcare. Doctors and our dental laboratory teams are using computers every day to generate our restorations via optical scanning. We are also using critical thinking skills to make a spontaneous decision regarding a tooth while working on it.
Now that you’ve put it that way, it makes sense. Tell me about what you are doing in your practice with digital technology.
Dr. Scherer: After completing dental school and residency, I knew that I wanted to leverage digital technology to make my everyday tasks easier, faster, and potentially more accurate. The challenge was the inherent complexity of digital technology. I have always dreaded making impressions for crown and bridge dentistry. The margins, tearing, voids, patients biting incorrectly, multi-unit framework fit, and so on, would keep me up at night thinking about the challenges waiting for me the next work day. Then the realization hit me like a freight-train. Intraoral scanning started to become more open and accessible. Fabricating crowns with intraoral scanning was proven. The big question is, “What else could we do with it?”
How did you begin with intraoral scanning?
Dr. Scherer: I began with the research and the literature to find out which of the scanners on the market were the most accurate. From my research at that time, I felt the 3M True Definition Scanner was the one for my practice. It also happened to be one of the most affordable scanners on the market at the time, so it was a win-win. I have been using that scanner, with some periodic upgrades, for a long time with tremendous success (Figure 4). Recently, I also purchased a TRIOS (3Shape) scanner, principally for my wife Melissa, as the system offers an excellent orthodontics software package that she uses frequently. The most important thing for me was starting simple and affordable, then growing from there.
I see. So, you started with simple procedures and then took it from there. What was your next step?
Dr. Scherer: I was receiving crowns back from the dental laboratory team with 3-D printed models from my 3M True Definition Scanner. So I said to myself, “Could I 3-D print in my office?” I started looking at what it would take to get involved in 3-D printing, and it was very expensive and overly complex. This was late 2013 to early 2014, and there weren’t many companies selling 3-D printers at the time. The ones that did sold them at a very expensive price. I bought several printers to test them out with filament technology, DLP projectors, and resin. And then, I then found out about Formlabs, which is a company that was started via Kickstarter to manufacture a desktop-grade printer at a low cost. I asked myself the same questions that many still do: “Can it really work for dentistry?”
Since then, I was confident that I was one of the first, if not the first dental clinician using desktop 3-D printing in an everyday clinical practice. I discovered open-ended CAD software to do simple model work (Figure 5) and/or traditional dental wax-ups (Figure 6). There was no manual available and very few people, if any, knew how to use this software for dentistry at the time.
Those were the early days. Please tell us what you are currently doing. What did you do this week with your scanners and printers?
Dr. Scherer: I live and breathe digital dentistry every day. I don’t just teach it. For example, just this week, I printed 5 surgical guides for implant cases, 14 models for crown and bridge and wax-up cases, and 2 occlusal guards. I finished the week traveling to an oral surgeon’s office to teach him how to use the 3-D printed guides in his surgical workflows; he placed 4 implants in a matter of minutes with the assistance of the surgical guide that was printed in just a few clicks. We are just starting to see the power in what 3-D printing can do in clinical dentistry!
It is, indeed, an incredible time to be practicing dentistry! Michael, I want to thank you for your time to do this interview. Based upon your own private practice and academic experiences, do you have any words of advice that your would like leave our readers?
Dr. Scherer: I would say that clinicians should strive to utilize full-arch restorative options, clinical procedures, and digital technology to improve outcomes without tremendously increasing costs. It can seem intimidating; however, anytime we do something for the first time, it can sound and be a bit challenging. Clinicians need to understand the value of cross-platform integration, and, while fully integrated systems are available and outstanding, clinicians still need to think outside of the box.
The key is to strive for simplicity. The best system we can ever have is a fully integrated mind!
Burns DR, Unger JW, Coffey JP, et al. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:12-22.
Scherer MD, McGlumphy EA, Seghi RR, et al. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:1619-1628.
Scherer MD, McGlumphy EA, Seghi RR, et al. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:515-521.
Dr. Scherer is an assistant clinical professor at Loma Linda University, a clinical instructor at University of Nevada in Las Vegas, and maintains a practice limited to prosthodontics and implant dentistry in Sonora, Calif. He is a Fellow of the American College of Prosthodontists, has published articles, DVD training series, and online full-arch reconstruction and 3-D printing courses (learndental3d.com) related to implant dentistry, clinical prosthodontics, and digital technology with a special emphasis on implant overdentures. As an avid technology and computer hobbyist, Dr. Scherer’s involvement in digital implant dentistry has led him to develop and utilize new technology with CAD/CAM surgical systems, implement interactive CBCT implant planning, and outside of the box concepts for radiographic imaging. Dr. Scherer also maintains the following popular YouTube channels: “LearnLOCATOR,” “LearnLODI,” “LearnSATURNO,” and “LearnLOCATOR F-Tx.” He can be reached via the email address: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Here is the original link of this article:http://dentistrytoday.com/implants/10336-future-trends-in-implant-dentistry-full-arch-rehabilitation-and-desktop-3-d-printing
If you have interest in dental equipments,please click here.